Bridging by thought not what it seems?

May 13, 2006 § 1 Comment

Each snow flake is a distinct work of art, crafted by nature, whose tools are the wind, the ice, the elements themselves. Awesome!

A thought, idea or insight “we” explain isn’t the thought “others” hear. Even as a single individual, my “own” understanding of a concept will change as I learn more about it by implementing it in different contexts. Most of the natural differences between different contexts will be simple to bridge, but whenwhere does a thought change into a variation of itself, or even into a completely different “original” thought?

It all depends on what significance people assign to a particular “thought”. Maybe we need/have an authoritative source to refer to, to call it “truth”. Maybe we work from our own related recollections of experiences which can be rather vague, or hard to distinguish well enough, and hard to explain, for becoming (re)useful in an other context, to call it “grounded knowledge”.

The latter way requires allowing such recollections. When naming those “internal babble” or “irrelevant”, in order to more easily ignore associations and messages bubbling up, we become even more unbalanced and stressed. In the flow, these messages do not need to be blocked.

I grew up learning to associate particular symbols to particular states for distinguishing internal parts involved. Such translation of perceptions into symbolic code does not guarantee perfect reproduction of original perception. Even within a gestalt perceptive field of an individual each distinctive part in a perception can and will take on new qualities as the field changes. And field changes can give birth to imperceptible alternatives.

What if there is (no) continuity between distinguished parts?

What if field changes create different perceptions?

Can a particular snowflake, seen on the level of detail where no snowflake seems the same, ever be reproduced exactly the same again in some future?

Related:

Advertisements

Tagged: , ,

§ One Response to Bridging by thought not what it seems?

  • […] And when someone else reads my thesis, his or her thoughts can fight mine, or his or her thoughts can try to make my thoughts their own to look at what appears, after which “it” can always be shaken off and put in the wardrobe for another such occasion, or thrown away. And who knows what happens when thoughts travel between minds? I certainly don’t! […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading Bridging by thought not what it seems? at Stone Circles.

meta

%d bloggers like this: